Deutsch  Search  Contact Newsletter Sign Up  German Info Home
spacer image
spacer image
Germany Info Home: Government & Politics: Statements & Speeches
spacer image

Other Priorities — War on Terrorism and Middle East Conflict — Are Pressing

Foreign Minister Joschka Fischer spoke of his opposition to a possible US attack on Iraq in light of the pressing goals of fighting international terrorism and resolving regional conflicts, in an interview with the Flensburger Tageblatt newspaper on August, 28, 2002.

(translated excerpts)

Flensburger Tageblatt: On foreign policy: the danger of a military strike by the United States against Iraq is increasing. What is the probability of such an attack in your view?
Fischer: I can't make a judgement on that. However, I regard an attack on Iraq with the goal of changing its regime as a highly risky and false move. Let me not be misunderstood: the United States is crucial as a factor of global political stability. But Iraq does not pose an acute threat to international security at the moment. I set other priorities here. Our principal aims remain the fight against international terrorism and the resolution of regional conflicts such as in the Middle East and between Pakistan and India.

Flensburger Tageblatt: The declared aim of the United States is to overthrow Saddam Hussein. UN demands for weapons inspections no longer play any sort of role for it.
Fischer: Exactly, which is why we are talking about two different things. If there is an attack which is solely for the purpose of changing the regime, the United States will be assuming responsibility for peace and stability in the entire region. That is an extremely difficult task that can only be dealt with successfully in the long term. There are huge risks in this. The position of the Federal Government is clear: we want solidarity in the fight against terror, but no adventures. And I see so many question marks over war to bring about a change of regime in Baghdad that I am filled with deep scepticism and must register my opposition.

Flensburger Tageblatt: Would it be at all possible to contain such a conflict?
Fischer: The use of weapons would be limited geographically. But the Middle East is a region that directly neighbours Europe. If that region reaches crisis point or explodes, then we will be directly affected. That is my main worry.

Flensburger Tageblatt: But this obviously doesn't concern the US Administration. There would be a substantial shift in the region's geopolitical situation. What plans does the international community have to bring peace to the crisis region following the possible end of the Saddam era?
Fischer: That's the vital question. What comes after? But there has so far been no answer to this question even from the Americans.

Flensburger Tageblatt: What particular role can Germany play in the Arab world?
Fischer: In the first place, there can only be a German foreign policy that is integrated within a European foreign and security policy. Beyond that, Germany, for historical reasons, has a special relationship with Israel. But just as Israel has a right to exist, the Palestinian people have the legitimate right to a democratic state of their own. We are in a position that makes us a credible interlocutor for both sides.

Flensburger Tageblatt: Do you still regard Arafat as a partner you can talk to?
Fischer: You cannot choose your partners – on either side. What is important is that we are talking about very serious conflicts. To me it is essential not only to talk about political goals but also to act. In this respect, not enough value is attached to the Arab League Summit. We must not let up in our efforts towards peace in the Middle East – especially now that it is slowly becoming clear to both sides that a military option cannot work. It only leads to a war of attrition which ends up nowhere. There can be only one solution in a struggle over the same country: a historic compromise. I regret that there has to be so much suffering and terrible loss of life before this happens. But in my view, we are on the way, an arduous one, to achieving a breakthrough in this process and towards changing the whole strategic situation in the Near and Middle East.



spacer image

short blue line
Statements & Speeches




short line
Newsletters

spacer Subscribe Here
You can also read the current issues here.
 short line

Printer Friendly PagePrinter-Friendly Page

Email This Article